As we edge closer to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), there's an ongoing debate about its role in human creativity.
Some argue that AGI could surpass human artists, writers, and thinkers — rendering much of what we call “creative work” obsolete. But others believe AGI might act as a co-creator, helping us think faster, visualize better, and iterate more freely.
I recently experimented with a generative AI to co-write a short story, and honestly, the results were surprisingly good — but it still needed my voice to make it meaningful.
Curious to know:
Do you see AGI as a threat or tool for creative professions?
Where should we draw the line between human and machine-generated art?
Could creativity be redefined in an AGI-driven world?
